So you’ve dutifully downloaded the NHS Track and Trace app and are no doubt wondering how it works. On the surface, it doesn’t really seem to do much; it just sits there in your pocket, digitally whirring away, occasionally dropping you the odd heart-stopping ping to tell you you’ve been in contact with somebody reporting Covid symptoms, before following it up with a ping to tell you there’s nothing you need to do. Some of you may also have been unfortunate enough to have been told, by the app, to self-isolate as somebody you’ve been in contact with has tested positive. But how does it know this? And should you take it seriously? I was recently interviewed on BBC Radio Nottingham to share my thoughts on the subject and I would like to expand on them here.
How the Track and Trace app works.
Is it reliable?
In truth, the app is now as reliable as it’s going to get, though not without some unnecessary delays which I’ll come to in a moment. However, the technology being used is not without its flaws.
Firstly, the app doesn’t know if there’s a wall between you and the other person. This means you can have a neighbour, with whom you’ve never come into contact, test positive and, because you’ve been sat a few feet away from each other but in different flats, you’ll still be told to self-isolate.
The app also has no way of knowing whether the phone has been left in your car, a desk or a gym locker. So again, you may never come into contact with somebody who has had a positive test, but if your phone has come into contact with theirs, you’ll still get a notification.
And of course, this is new technology which remains largely untested and unproven, so there are likely to be bugs and kinks in the system which will need to be ironed out over time.
All that being said, I do believe that we now have the most effective possible version of the app.
Why are people angry?
We’ve got a working app that does as much as we can reasonably ask from it, so what more do people want? Well, in truth, the app we have now is the app we could have had months ago, were it not for significant and unnecessary delays.
In hindsight, the problem was the NHS wanted to be able to track more data than Google and Apple’s privacy policies would allow. The argument is that by harvesting a lot more data, the NHS would be able to dive deeper into how the virus spreads and the context surrounding infection. There is a more cynical view that the additional data harvested would also make the app far more valuable to the developer, but this has been debunked by sources close to the NHS. However, with a big delay and costly organisational chaos, eventually, the ‘world beating’ version of the app was abandoned, and the backup app, which other countries had months ago, was finally rolled out in the UK during September.
Personally I have always remained doubtful that a track and trace app can even work on a Virus such as Covid 19. A virus that has a large amount of a-symp-toe-matic cases amongst a population of 68m. I can see that it could have potentially worked for a disease such as Ebola or SARS outbreaks because these are deadly diseases in concentrated areas and if caught quick enough can stop the spread. I think once a country like the UK is getting close to 30,000 news cases a day, then the horse has already bolted so to speak, and the virus becomes very hard to contain. Hopefully once numbers are in the hundreds the app will have a better chance of success.
So, while the app alone was never enough to be the saviour of mankind, I do believe it remains the best use of available technology for this purpose and, combined with rigorous testing and the incoming vaccine, will help to put this awful business behind us. Though I would certainly question the cost, both in financial and human terms, of the delays to production. If you’d like to hear me talk about this subject on BBC Radio Nottingham, the interview can be found here: